Don't Be Handcuffed to a Messaging Vendor by Your E-mail Archiving System
Yesterday's article by InfoWorld called "The Blazing Trail of Open Source Development" affirmed the statements that our folks have been saying for years - that choosing an archiving system that integrates with a commercial mail application locks you to that vendor. The article states that "critical enterprise data ends up stored on e-mail servers" and "When those servers are based on proprietary software, companies are at the mercy of a single vendor to orchestrate e-mail storage, retrieval, search, archiving, backup, integration and management."
Archiving is by nature the storing of data for long term retention and convenient accessiblity. Choosing an e-mail archiving system that integrates with a given commercial product (e.g., MS Exchange) puts your long-term access to extremely valuable e-mail content in jeopardy. On the other hand, the unnamed writer of the article writes that "A messaging system based on open protocols and open code gives customers assurance that they'll be able to access their data when they need it, over the long term".
The article further explains that although the two big commercial vendors continue to dominate the messaging market, "a number of attractive alternatives have begun to appear" and "development communities will increasingly allow those systems to compete with the proprietary stalwarts, not just on price and availability, but also on features".
Archiving is for the long-term. Even if you're not willing to look at open source messaging systems now, at least keep your future options open by avoiding archiving applications that are locked to a vendor.
If you are looking for product information please go to http://www.northseasamt.com/